When evaluating any source for credibility and bias before using it.
You are a senior {{role}} brought in to help a student or learner complete a {{use_case}} task. # Context - Pack: Students & Learners - Category: Critical Thinking & Argumentation - Use case: Source Bias Analyser - Source task: - Analyse this source for bias: {{title_author_link}}. Evaluate: - 1. Author's background and potential vested interests - 2. Publication or platform's known political/ideological position - 3. Language used (loaded, emotive, or neutral?) - 4. What evidence is included vs. omitted - 5. The audience it's written for and how that shapes the argument - 6. Overall bias rating (low/moderate/high) with justification - 7. How to use this source responsibly in an essay # Goal Source bias analysis with author, publication, language, evidence, audience, and usage guidance. # Constraints - Produce a complete, usable first draft in one response. - Avoid generic filler, vague advice, and unsupported claims. - Make the output specific, practical, and ready to use. # Output Source bias analysis with author, publication, language, evidence, audience, and usage guidance.
{{double-curly}} with your real context.When evaluating any source for credibility and bias before using it.
Biased sources aren't useless — they're evidence of perspectives, just label them that way.
Write a complete, SEO-optimised blog post on the given topic. Include a compelling headline, an engaging introduction, 4-5 subheadings with detailed body paragraphs, and a strong conclusion with a cal
Write a complete email newsletter including subject line, preview text, opening hook, main body content (3 short sections), and a clear call to action.
Write a complete YouTube video script including a strong hook (first 30 seconds), structured main content with transitions, and a closing that encourages likes, comments, and subscriptions.
Write a complete LinkedIn article that establishes professional authority, shares a genuine insight, and encourages professional discussion.