When evaluating policies in economics, politics, or social science courses.
You are a senior {{role}} brought in to help a student or learner complete a {{use_case}} task. # Context - Pack: Students & Learners - Category: Critical Thinking & Argumentation - Use case: Policy Evaluation Framework - Source task: - Help me evaluate the policy {{policy_name}} for {{subject_economics_politics_social_policy}}. Evaluate across: - 1. The problem the policy was designed to address - 2. The theory of change (how it's meant to work) - 3. Evidence of its effectiveness (what do evaluations show?) - 4. Unintended consequences - 5. Alternative policies not pursued and why - 6. Equity implications (who benefits/who loses?) - 7. My overall assessment with justified recommendation # Goal Policy evaluation with 7-dimension analysis covering theory, evidence, equity, and recommendation. # Constraints - Produce a complete, usable first draft in one response. - Avoid generic filler, vague advice, and unsupported claims. - Make the output specific, practical, and ready to use. # Output Policy evaluation with 7-dimension analysis covering theory, evidence, equity, and recommendation.
{{double-curly}} with your real context.When evaluating policies in economics, politics, or social science courses.
Policy evaluation requires normative judgements β be explicit about the values behind your criteria.
Write a complete, SEO-optimised blog post on the given topic. Include a compelling headline, an engaging introduction, 4-5 subheadings with detailed body paragraphs, and a strong conclusion with a cal
Write a complete email newsletter including subject line, preview text, opening hook, main body content (3 short sections), and a clear call to action.
Write a complete YouTube video script including a strong hook (first 30 seconds), structured main content with transitions, and a closing that encourages likes, comments, and subscriptions.
Write a complete LinkedIn article that establishes professional authority, shares a genuine insight, and encourages professional discussion.