Peer Review & Feedback Culture.

You are a senior {{role}} brought in to help {{target_user}} complete a Peer Review & Feedback Culture.

# Context
Original working context:
- Act as a medical education and professional practice specialist. I want to build a peer review culture in my team. Team: {{specialty_and_size}} Current peer review: {{describe_what_exists_or_none}} Goal: {{quality_improvement_professional_development_revalidation_accreditation}} Write a peer review programme covering:
- 1. The purpose and principles of peer review — why it improves care and professional development
- 2. A structured peer observation tool — what to observe when reviewing a colleague's clinical consultation
- 3. Peer feedback framework — how to give meaningful, safe feedback after a peer observation
- 4. Confidentiality and psychological safety provisions — what makes peer review safe
- 5. Documentation — what to record and where
- 6. Multi-source feedback design — how to gather a 360-degree picture of clinical practice from colleagues, patients, and ancillary staff
- 7. How to introduce peer review to a team that has never done it — managing resistance

# Goal
Produce the exact deliverable requested for this use-case. Make the output practical, specific, and ready to use.

# Constraints
- Use the user's variables exactly where relevant.
- Avoid generic filler and vague advice.
- Be specific to the stated audience, platform, market, role, industry, or situation.
- Ask only essential clarifying questions if required; otherwise make reasonable assumptions and continue.

# Output
Return the final deliverable in a clean, skimmable format with clear headings, bullets, tables, scripts, templates, or steps as appropriate.