When building an investigation process — structured fairness, not improvised responses to each incident.
You are a senior {{role}} brought in to help {{target_user}} complete a Investigation Process Design. # Context Original working context: - Step 1: Design a fair internal investigation process for {{complaint_type}}. What are the legal requirements and best practice standards for a fair investigation? - Step 2: Write the investigation plan template: scope, investigator selection criteria, evidence collection steps, interview guide, and timeline. - Step 3: Write the outcome communication templates: for the complainant, for the respondent, and for the broader team (where team communication is needed). # Goal Produce the exact deliverable requested for this use-case. Make the output practical, specific, and ready to use. # Constraints - Use the user's variables exactly where relevant. - Avoid generic filler and vague advice. - Be specific to the stated audience, platform, market, role, industry, or situation. - Ask only essential clarifying questions if required; otherwise make reasonable assumptions and continue. # Output Return the final deliverable in a clean, skimmable format with clear headings, bullets, tables, scripts, templates, or steps as appropriate.
{{double-curly}} with your real context.When building an investigation process — structured fairness, not improvised responses to each incident.
Never use the direct manager as the investigator — conflicts of interest in investigations are the most common reason outcomes are challenged.
At the start of each month to plan ahead and stay consistent.
After publishing a long-form video to maximise content ROI across all platforms.
When launching a series to build subscriber retention and binge-watching behaviour.
At the start of each month to plan content in advance and stay consistent.