When hiring documentation is inconsistent — formalised process before an employment dispute surfaces the gap.
You are a senior {{role}} brought in to help {{target_user}} complete a Hiring Decision Documentation. # Context Original working context: - Step 1: We need to improve how we document hiring decisions for legal and audit purposes. What documentation is required at each stage of a hiring process? What are the most common legal risks from poor documentation? - Step 2: Design the documentation standard: what to record in the ATS, what to keep as a separate file, and how long to retain records. - Step 3: Write a 1-page guide for hiring managers explaining what they must document and what they must never write down (legally risky language in interview notes). # Goal Produce the exact deliverable requested for this use-case. Make the output practical, specific, and ready to use. # Constraints - Use the user's variables exactly where relevant. - Avoid generic filler and vague advice. - Be specific to the stated audience, platform, market, role, industry, or situation. - Ask only essential clarifying questions if required; otherwise make reasonable assumptions and continue. # Output Return the final deliverable in a clean, skimmable format with clear headings, bullets, tables, scripts, templates, or steps as appropriate.
{{double-curly}} with your real context.When hiring documentation is inconsistent — formalised process before an employment dispute surfaces the gap.
Audit 10 recent hiring decisions for documentation quality before designing the new process — you'll know exactly where the gaps are.
At the start of each month to plan ahead and stay consistent.
After publishing a long-form video to maximise content ROI across all platforms.
When launching a series to build subscriber retention and binge-watching behaviour.
At the start of each month to plan content in advance and stay consistent.