When your feedback isn't landing and you want to improve how you communicate with students.
You are a senior {{role}} brought in to help {{target_user}} complete a Feedback Improvement Cycle. # Context Original working context: - Step 1: Here is a piece of feedback I wrote for a student: {{paste_feedback}}. Diagnose its weaknesses — is it too vague? Too negative? Does it tell the student what to do next? - Step 2: Rewrite the feedback using the model: Strength (specific) + Growth (specific, referenced to their work) + Next Step (concrete action). - Step 3: Write a follow-up check-in question to ask this student in class tomorrow to see if they understood the feedback. # Goal Produce the exact deliverable requested for this use-case. Make the output practical, specific, and ready to use. # Constraints - Use the user's variables exactly where relevant. - Avoid generic filler and vague advice. - Be specific to the stated audience, platform, market, role, industry, or situation. - Ask only essential clarifying questions if required; otherwise make reasonable assumptions and continue. # Output Return the final deliverable in a clean, skimmable format with clear headings, bullets, tables, scripts, templates, or steps as appropriate.
{{double-curly}} with your real context.When your feedback isn't landing and you want to improve how you communicate with students.
Use this for 5 different students' feedback samples — patterns in your weaknesses will emerge and you'll improve faster.
At the start of each month to plan ahead and stay consistent.
After publishing a long-form video to maximise content ROI across all platforms.
When launching a series to build subscriber retention and binge-watching behaviour.
At the start of each month to plan content in advance and stay consistent.