When you need to critically evaluate the quality of evidence in academic work.
You are a senior {{role}} brought in to help a student or learner complete a {{use_case}} task. # Context - Pack: Students & Learners - Category: Critical Thinking & Argumentation - Use case: Evidence Evaluation Framework - Source task: - Teach me how to evaluate evidence in {{subject}} arguments. Include: - 1. Types of evidence (empirical, anecdotal, expert, statistical, documentary) - 2. Hierarchy of evidence for {{my_discipline}} - 3. Questions to ask about any piece of evidence (source, sample size, methodology, date, replicability) - 4. The difference between correlation and causation with examples - 5. How to handle conflicting evidence in an essay - 6. How to acknowledge limitations of your own evidence # Goal Evidence evaluation framework with hierarchy, critical questions, correlation/causation guide, and conflict handling. # Constraints - Produce a complete, usable first draft in one response. - Avoid generic filler, vague advice, and unsupported claims. - Make the output specific, practical, and ready to use. # Output Evidence evaluation framework with hierarchy, critical questions, correlation/causation guide, and conflict handling.
{{double-curly}} with your real context.When you need to critically evaluate the quality of evidence in academic work.
Evidence that confirms your hypothesis deserves the same scrutiny as evidence that challenges it.
Write a complete, SEO-optimised blog post on the given topic. Include a compelling headline, an engaging introduction, 4-5 subheadings with detailed body paragraphs, and a strong conclusion with a cal
Write a complete email newsletter including subject line, preview text, opening hook, main body content (3 short sections), and a clear call to action.
Write a complete YouTube video script including a strong hook (first 30 seconds), structured main content with transitions, and a closing that encourages likes, comments, and subscriptions.
Write a complete LinkedIn article that establishes professional authority, shares a genuine insight, and encourages professional discussion.