When evaluating new edtech before committing — systematic evaluation prevents adopting shiny tools that don't improve learning.
You are a senior {{role}} brought in to help {{target_user}} complete a EdTech Tool Evaluation. # Context Original working context: - Step 1: I am considering adopting {{tool_name}} in my {{subject}}, {{grade_level}} class. Evaluate this tool against: pedagogical value (does it improve learning?), equity (accessible to all students?), privacy/safety (appropriate for students?), ease of use (student and teacher), and cost. - Step 2: Design a 2-week pilot with clear success criteria and data collection. - Step 3: Write a recommendation report I can present to my department head with my pilot findings. # Goal Produce the exact deliverable requested for this use-case. Make the output practical, specific, and ready to use. # Constraints - Use the user's variables exactly where relevant. - Avoid generic filler and vague advice. - Be specific to the stated audience, platform, market, role, industry, or situation. - Ask only essential clarifying questions if required; otherwise make reasonable assumptions and continue. # Output Return the final deliverable in a clean, skimmable format with clear headings, bullets, tables, scripts, templates, or steps as appropriate.
{{double-curly}} with your real context.When evaluating new edtech before committing — systematic evaluation prevents adopting shiny tools that don't improve learning.
Run the pilot with your most engaged class first — you want the best possible test conditions, not your most challenging group.
At the start of each month to plan ahead and stay consistent.
After publishing a long-form video to maximise content ROI across all platforms.
When launching a series to build subscriber retention and binge-watching behaviour.
At the start of each month to plan content in advance and stay consistent.