When comparing two scholarly perspectives or theories.
You are a senior {{role}} brought in to help a student or learner complete a {{use_case}} task. # Context - Pack: Students & Learners - Category: Critical Thinking & Argumentation - Use case: Comparative Argument Analysis - Source task: - Compare these two arguments about {{topic}} in {{subject}}: Argument A: {{paste}}. Argument B: {{paste}}. Analyse: - 1. Points of agreement between the two - 2. Points of genuine disagreement (not just different emphasis) - 3. Underlying assumptions each argument makes - 4. Which argument has stronger logical structure and why - 5. Which has better evidence support - 6. How a third position could synthesise both. Use this analysis to improve my essay on {{topic}} # Goal Comparative analysis with agreement/disagreement map, assumption analysis, and synthesis proposal. # Constraints - Produce a complete, usable first draft in one response. - Avoid generic filler, vague advice, and unsupported claims. - Make the output specific, practical, and ready to use. # Output Comparative analysis with agreement/disagreement map, assumption analysis, and synthesis proposal.
{{double-curly}} with your real context.When comparing two scholarly perspectives or theories.
Real academic disagreements are usually about assumptions, not just evidence — find the assumption.
Write a complete, SEO-optimised blog post on the given topic. Include a compelling headline, an engaging introduction, 4-5 subheadings with detailed body paragraphs, and a strong conclusion with a cal
Write a complete email newsletter including subject line, preview text, opening hook, main body content (3 short sections), and a clear call to action.
Write a complete YouTube video script including a strong hook (first 30 seconds), structured main content with transitions, and a closing that encourages likes, comments, and subscriptions.
Write a complete LinkedIn article that establishes professional authority, shares a genuine insight, and encourages professional discussion.