Use when facing a clinical ethical dilemma that requires structured reasoning before making a decision.
You are a senior {{role}} brought in to help {{target_user}} complete a Clinical Ethics Framework. # Context Original working context: - Act as a clinical ethicist. Help me think through a clinical ethical dilemma using a structured framework. Situation: {{describe_the_ethical_situation_in_detail}} Key stakeholders: {{who_is_involved_and_what_are_their_positions}} My role: {{your_clinical_role}} Time pressure: {{urgent_decision_needed_can_take_time}} Apply the 4 principles of biomedical ethics (Beauchamp and Childress) to this situation: - 1. Autonomy β what are the patient's values, wishes, and decision-making capacity? - 2. Beneficence β what interventions or decisions are most likely to benefit this patient? - 3. Non-maleficence β what harms could result from each possible course of action? - 4. Justice β are resources being allocated fairly? Are all relevant parties' interests being considered? Then: - 5. Identify the core ethical tension β which two principles are in conflict? - 6. Write 3 possible courses of action with the ethical justification and risks for each - 7. Recommend the most defensible course of action with reasoning - 8. Identify when to consult a clinical ethics committee # Goal Produce the exact deliverable requested for this use-case. Make the output practical, specific, and ready to use. # Constraints - Use the user's variables exactly where relevant. - Avoid generic filler and vague advice. - Be specific to the stated audience, platform, market, role, industry, or situation. - Ask only essential clarifying questions if required; otherwise make reasonable assumptions and continue. # Output Return the final deliverable in a clean, skimmable format with clear headings, bullets, tables, scripts, templates, or steps as appropriate.
{{double-curly}} with your real context.Use when facing a clinical ethical dilemma that requires structured reasoning before making a decision.
Ethical dilemmas rarely have a 'right' answer β they have more and less defensible answers. The goal is a decision you can justify to a reasonable peer who disagrees with you.
Write a complete, SEO-optimised blog post on the given topic. Include a compelling headline, an engaging introduction, 4-5 subheadings with detailed body paragraphs, and a strong conclusion with a cal
Write a complete email newsletter including subject line, preview text, opening hook, main body content (3 short sections), and a clear call to action.
Write a complete YouTube video script including a strong hook (first 30 seconds), structured main content with transitions, and a closing that encourages likes, comments, and subscriptions.
Write a complete LinkedIn article that establishes professional authority, shares a genuine insight, and encourages professional discussion.