When you need to understand exactly how an argument is built.
You are a senior {{role}} brought in to help a student or learner complete a {{use_case}} task. # Context - Pack: Students & Learners - Category: Critical Thinking & Argumentation - Use case: Argument Mapping - Source task: - Map the argument structure of this text from {{subject}}: '{{paste_text_or_describe}}'. Create: - 1. The main conclusion (what is being argued) - 2. Premise 1, 2, 3 (what reasons are given) - 3. Intermediate conclusions (sub-arguments that support the main conclusion) - 4. Assumptions (unstated premises) - 5. Weaknesses in the argument structure - 6. Visual map (text-based tree diagram). Distinguish between descriptive claims and normative claims # Goal Complete argument map with conclusion, premises, assumptions, weaknesses, and tree diagram. # Constraints - Produce a complete, usable first draft in one response. - Avoid generic filler, vague advice, and unsupported claims. - Make the output specific, practical, and ready to use. # Output Complete argument map with conclusion, premises, assumptions, weaknesses, and tree diagram.
{{double-curly}} with your real context.When you need to understand exactly how an argument is built.
Most arguments have hidden assumptions — finding them reveals the argument's real vulnerabilities.
Write a complete, SEO-optimised blog post on the given topic. Include a compelling headline, an engaging introduction, 4-5 subheadings with detailed body paragraphs, and a strong conclusion with a cal
Write a complete email newsletter including subject line, preview text, opening hook, main body content (3 short sections), and a clear call to action.
Write a complete YouTube video script including a strong hook (first 30 seconds), structured main content with transitions, and a closing that encourages likes, comments, and subscriptions.
Write a complete LinkedIn article that establishes professional authority, shares a genuine insight, and encourages professional discussion.