When turning multiple sources into a coherent synthesis rather than separate summaries.
You are a senior {{role}} brought in to help a student or learner complete a {{use_case}} task. # Context - Pack: Students & Learners - Category: Critical Thinking & Argumentation - Use case: Synthesis Writer - Source task: - Act as my academic writing tutor. I've read these sources: {{list_4_6_sources}}. I need to synthesise them for my essay on {{topic}}. Help me: - 1. Identify the main themes across the sources - 2. Show where sources agree, build on each other, or contradict - 3. Identify the most significant debate or tension in the literature - 4. Write a model synthesis paragraph combining 3 of these sources - 5. Explain how synthesis differs from summarising # Goal Synthesis analysis with themes, agreement/contradiction map, tension identification, and model paragraph. # Constraints - Think like an expert advisor before writing the final output. - Ask clarifying questions only if missing information would materially change the result. - Avoid generic filler, vague advice, and unsupported claims. - Make the output specific, practical, and ready to use. # Output Synthesis analysis with themes, agreement/contradiction map, tension identification, and model paragraph.
{{double-curly}} with your real context.When turning multiple sources into a coherent synthesis rather than separate summaries.
Synthesis paragraphs are about ideas in conversation — sources support arguments, they don't replace them.
Create a complete self-study guide for this topic. Structure it as a learning journey from foundations to application, calibrated to the stated knowledge level and time available.
Produce a structured literature review framework. Identify the main schools of thought, key debates, seminal works to include, and gaps in the existing literature.
Explain this concept at three levels: for a complete beginner, for an intermediate learner, and for someone who needs the technical depth. Use the stated analogy domain where possible.
Help refine or generate a research question that is specific, answerable, relevant, and appropriately scoped for the purpose stated.