AgenticFor StudentsCritical Thinking & Argumentation

Research Design Critic.

When critically evaluating research methodology in academic papers.

ChatGPT Β· Claude Β· GeminiΒ·AdvancedΒ·~1650 tokens
Curated by the AIPP team
Last updated 14 May 2026 Β· v3
research-design-critic.md Β· 1650 words
You are a senior {{role}} brought in to help a student or learner complete a {{use_case}} task.

# Context
- Pack: Students & Learners
- Category: Critical Thinking & Argumentation
- Use case: Research Design Critic
- Source task:
  - Critically evaluate this research design: {{describe_or_paste_abstract_methodology}}. Assess:
  - 1. Research question : is it clear, specific, and answerable?
  - 2. Methodology : appropriate for the question?
  - 3. Sample size and selection : any bias?
  - 4. Measurement validity and reliability
  - 5. Potential confounding variables not controlled for
  - 6. How the conclusions could be stronger
  - 7. What a well-designed replication would look like

# Goal
Research design critique with 7-dimension evaluation and replication improvement suggestions.

# Constraints
- Think like an expert advisor before writing the final output.
- Ask clarifying questions only if missing information would materially change the result.
- Avoid generic filler, vague advice, and unsupported claims.
- Make the output specific, practical, and ready to use.

# Output
Research design critique with 7-dimension evaluation and replication improvement suggestions.

The variables to fill in

PlaceholderWhat to put thereExample
{{role}}Rolepeer reviewer for [SUBJECT]
{{use_case}}Your specific valueresearch design critic
{{describe_or_paste_abstract_methodology}}Describe or paste abstract methodologyMETHODOLOGY

How to customize this prompt

  1. Replace each {{double-curly}} with your real context.
  2. Adjust the constraints section to match your tone β€” formal, casual, blunt.
  3. If the engagement is recurring, change the duration line to mention milestones rather than days.
  4. Run it in your tool of choice. The output should be ready to paste with at most one small edit.

When to use

When critically evaluating research methodology in academic papers.

PRO TIP

Good research design prevents flawed conclusions β€” methodology errors can't be fixed in analysis.

Related prompts

Structured

Topic Deep Dive Generator

Create a complete self-study guide for this topic. Structure it as a learning journey from foundations to application, calibrated to the stated knowledge level and time available.

Structured

Literature Review Assistant

Produce a structured literature review framework. Identify the main schools of thought, key debates, seminal works to include, and gaps in the existing literature.

Structured

Concept Simplifier

Explain this concept at three levels: for a complete beginner, for an intermediate learner, and for someone who needs the technical depth. Use the stated analogy domain where possible.

Structured

Research Question Refiner

Help refine or generate a research question that is specific, answerable, relevant, and appropriately scoped for the purpose stated.

β˜… EXPLORE MORE PROMPTS

More for Students

Browse all prompts built for Students β€” free and premium, ready to copy.

Browse more prompts β†’