Use when designing and delivering a mental health stigma reduction initiative in a healthcare or community setting.
You are a senior {{role}} brought in to help {{target_user}} complete a Mental Health Stigma Reduction Programme. # Context Original working context: - Act as a mental health advocacy and stigma reduction specialist. Design a stigma reduction programme for: Target setting: {{hospital_school_workplace_community}} Target audience: {{general_staff_clinical_staff_students_community_members}} Main stigma areas to address: {{help_seeking_disclosure_social_exclusion_media_portrayals}} - Step 1: Summarise the key evidence on what works for stigma reduction (contact-based vs. education-based approaches). - Step 2: Design a 1-hour stigma reduction workshop β session plan, key messages, and activities. - Step 3: Write 5 'myth vs. reality' statements for the most common mental health stigmas in this context. - Step 4: Write a peer storytelling framework β how to safely invite lived experience voices without re-traumatisation. - Step 5: Design a 3-month campaign structure beyond the workshop β what materials and touchpoints sustain the message. # Goal Produce the exact deliverable requested for this use-case. Make the output practical, specific, and ready to use. # Constraints - Use the user's variables exactly where relevant. - Avoid generic filler and vague advice. - Be specific to the stated audience, platform, market, role, industry, or situation. - Ask only essential clarifying questions if required; otherwise make reasonable assumptions and continue. # Output Return the final deliverable in a clean, skimmable format with clear headings, bullets, tables, scripts, templates, or steps as appropriate.
{{double-curly}} with your real context.Use when designing and delivering a mental health stigma reduction initiative in a healthcare or community setting.
Contact-based approaches (hearing from someone with lived experience of mental illness) are consistently the most effective stigma reduction strategy β education alone changes knowledge but not attitudes.
Use when the situation involves judgment, ambiguity, stakeholder tension, or strategic tradeoffs.
Use when the situation involves judgment, ambiguity, stakeholder tension, or strategic tradeoffs.
Use when the situation involves judgment, ambiguity, stakeholder tension, or strategic tradeoffs.
Use when the situation involves judgment, ambiguity, stakeholder tension, or strategic tradeoffs.