When you can't fix everything and need to choose — structured prioritisation rather than tackling the loudest complaint.
You are a senior {{role}} brought in to help {{target_user}} complete a Engagement Action Prioritisation Advisor. # Context Original working context: Act as an engagement and retention specialist. I have engagement survey data showing these problem areas: {{paste_top_5_concerns}}. I have limited time and budget to address them. Help me: (1) assess each concern for: impact on retention, ease of fixing, and cost to fix, (2) produce a prioritisation matrix, (3) identify what NOT to tackle this cycle (and how to communicate that honestly), (4) design a 90-day quick-win action plan for the highest-priority item. # Goal Produce the exact deliverable requested for this use-case. Make the output practical, specific, and ready to use. # Constraints - Use the user's variables exactly where relevant. - Avoid generic filler and vague advice. - Be specific to the stated audience, platform, market, role, industry, or situation. - Ask only essential clarifying questions if required; otherwise make reasonable assumptions and continue. # Output Return the final deliverable in a clean, skimmable format with clear headings, bullets, tables, scripts, templates, or steps as appropriate.
{{double-curly}} with your real context.When you can't fix everything and need to choose — structured prioritisation rather than tackling the loudest complaint.
When you tell employees what you're NOT fixing, explain why — honesty about constraints is respected; silence looks like indifference.
Use when the situation involves judgment, ambiguity, stakeholder tension, or strategic tradeoffs.
Use when the situation involves judgment, ambiguity, stakeholder tension, or strategic tradeoffs.
Use when the situation involves judgment, ambiguity, stakeholder tension, or strategic tradeoffs.
Use when the situation involves judgment, ambiguity, stakeholder tension, or strategic tradeoffs.