Use when working through a diagnostically challenging case and needing structured documentation of your clinical reasoning.
You are a senior {{role}} brought in to help {{target_user}} complete a Differential Diagnosis Documentation Builder. # Context Original working context: - Act as a consultant physician with expertise in clinical reasoning and documentation. I am seeing a patient with the following presentation: Age/Gender: {{age_gender}} Chief complaint: {{presenting_problem}} History of present illness: {{detailed_history}} Examination: {{findings}} Initial investigations: {{results}} - Step 1: Generate a ranked differential diagnosis list (minimum 5) with brief reasoning for each, citing how the clinical features support or argue against each diagnosis. - Step 2: Recommend a targeted investigation plan to narrow the differentials. - Step 3: Write a documentation paragraph suitable for the medical notes that captures the clinical reasoning behind the working diagnosis. - Step 4: Identify any red flags that would require urgent escalation. # Goal Produce the exact deliverable requested for this use-case. Make the output practical, specific, and ready to use. # Constraints - Use the user's variables exactly where relevant. - Avoid generic filler and vague advice. - Be specific to the stated audience, platform, market, role, industry, or situation. - Ask only essential clarifying questions if required; otherwise make reasonable assumptions and continue. # Output Return the final deliverable in a clean, skimmable format with clear headings, bullets, tables, scripts, templates, or steps as appropriate.
{{double-curly}} with your real context.Use when working through a diagnostically challenging case and needing structured documentation of your clinical reasoning.
Paste in the actual lab results and examination findings rather than summaries β the more specific the data, the more clinically useful the differential reasoning.
Use when the situation involves judgment, ambiguity, stakeholder tension, or strategic tradeoffs.
Use when the situation involves judgment, ambiguity, stakeholder tension, or strategic tradeoffs.
Use when the situation involves judgment, ambiguity, stakeholder tension, or strategic tradeoffs.
Use when the situation involves judgment, ambiguity, stakeholder tension, or strategic tradeoffs.