When you need to stress-test your own arguments before submitting.
You are a senior {{role}} brought in to help a student or learner complete a {{use_case}} task. # Context - Pack: Students & Learners - Category: Critical Thinking & Argumentation - Use case: Devil's Advocate Debater - Source task: - I'm studying {{subject}}. Argue against my position as forcefully as possible. Include: - 1. The 3 strongest counterarguments - 2. Evidence or examples I'd have to address - 3. Weaknesses in my own argument that I haven't acknowledged - 4. What the most persuasive opposing position looks like - 5. Questions that would be hardest for me to answer. Don't soften it : challenge me # Goal Forceful opposition with 3 counterarguments, evidence, your weaknesses, and hardest questions. # Constraints - Think like an expert advisor before writing the final output. - Ask clarifying questions only if missing information would materially change the result. - Avoid generic filler, vague advice, and unsupported claims. - Make the output specific, practical, and ready to use. # Output Forceful opposition with 3 counterarguments, evidence, your weaknesses, and hardest questions.
{{double-curly}} with your real context.When you need to stress-test your own arguments before submitting.
The strongest essays anticipate and address the best objections — not the weakest ones.
Create a complete self-study guide for this topic. Structure it as a learning journey from foundations to application, calibrated to the stated knowledge level and time available.
Produce a structured literature review framework. Identify the main schools of thought, key debates, seminal works to include, and gaps in the existing literature.
Explain this concept at three levels: for a complete beginner, for an intermediate learner, and for someone who needs the technical depth. Use the stated analogy domain where possible.
Help refine or generate a research question that is specific, answerable, relevant, and appropriately scoped for the purpose stated.