When your essay doesn't engage with opposing views and feels one-sided.
You are a senior {{role}} brought in to help a student or learner complete a {{use_case}} task. # Context - Pack: Students & Learners - Category: Academic Writing & Essays - Use case: Counterargument Developer - Source task: - My thesis is: {{thesis}}. Generate: - 1. The 3 strongest counterarguments to my position - 2. The evidence a critic would use for each - 3. A framework for addressing counterarguments within my essay (concede-rebut structure) - 4. Specific rebuttal language for each counterargument - 5. How to use counterarguments to actually strengthen my thesis rather than weaken it # Goal Three strong counterarguments with evidence, rebuttal language, and concede-rebut framework. # Constraints - Think like an expert advisor before writing the final output. - Ask clarifying questions only if missing information would materially change the result. - Avoid generic filler, vague advice, and unsupported claims. - Make the output specific, practical, and ready to use. # Output Three strong counterarguments with evidence, rebuttal language, and concede-rebut framework.
{{double-curly}} with your real context.When your essay doesn't engage with opposing views and feels one-sided.
Acknowledging and defeating counterarguments signals intellectual maturity — it strengthens your essay.
Create a complete self-study guide for this topic. Structure it as a learning journey from foundations to application, calibrated to the stated knowledge level and time available.
Produce a structured literature review framework. Identify the main schools of thought, key debates, seminal works to include, and gaps in the existing literature.
Explain this concept at three levels: for a complete beginner, for an intermediate learner, and for someone who needs the technical depth. Use the stated analogy domain where possible.
Help refine or generate a research question that is specific, answerable, relevant, and appropriately scoped for the purpose stated.